Published on 15 February 2026
The Internet is almost anonymous and privacy-preserving by design. I mean, unless some administrator actively tries to track you, there is no built-in identity layer. What breaks both properties is the centralization of communication onto closed platforms, where identification becomes possible either by the hosting company itself, or by governments compelling them to cooperate.
After recent events, it is time for us to start using protocols again instead of services.
Services are easy targets
A government that wants to identify users, censor content, or enforce compliance only needs to send one letter to one company. One subpoena, one court order, one regulatory demand: the service likely complies or faces fines, lawsuits, or bans.
This is happening right now. Governments worldwide are passing laws that require platforms to verify the age of their users. Discord is voluntarily rolling out mandatory "teen-by-default" settings until proof of majority (by submitting a face scan or, God forbid, a government-issued ID), likely anticipating future regulatory obligations.
None of this could happen with a protocol. You cannot require age verification on IRC, XMPP, ActivityPub, Nostr, or Matrix, because there is no single entity to compel. Each server operator makes their own decisions. A government would need to individually pressure thousands of independent operators across dozens of jurisdictions, which is a legislative and enforcement impossibility. And even if one server complied, users would simply move to another.
Switching services solves nothing
After Discord's announcement, the instinct is to migrate to another service. This is pointless. The new service will either operate under the same jurisdiction and face the same rules, or it will be offshore and eventually blocked or pressured once it becomes large enough to matter. You are just moving from one regulable entity to another.
The actual solution is to stop depending on a specific commercial service and start using a protocol. This is not a radical idea. We already do it with email. SMTP is a protocol. You can switch providers, self-host, or use any combination.
Email may not seem to be the best example since it has become an oligopoly where Google, Microsoft, and maybe also Apple control the vast majority of the email infrastructure. But actually, this is a good example to show how protocols are resilient. Let's say Google bans your account, then you can move to another provider and still reach every Gmail user. In a more extreme scenario, let's even say Google and Microsoft discontinue their service (in your specific region, for example), even block any inbound message from you. Not ideal, but SMTP implementations still exist and they still work even in a very degraded mode. You'd need to migrate (as well as some of your connections), but there is absolutely no need to reimplement anything. That is the difference with a service like Discord.
On a centralized service, if your account is deleted or banned, you are gone for good.
Use protocols
Every time we choose a service over a protocol, we opt into a system where a single company can be compelled to identify us, restrict us, or hand over our data, to their profit or out government's advantage.
Instagram Engineering
Shopify Engineering